The Supreme Court was considering a case today dealing with when it is appropriate to allow school officials to strip search students in the search for contraband. The ACLU lawyer discussed the school’s actions in terms of an “ick” factor, and certainly thinking about Clarence "Bill of Responsibilities" Thomas and Antonin Scalia discussing searching a girl’s underwear was enough to make me gag. As John Cole pointed out when talking about the same case, our priorities are seriously out of whack when there is even an argument about the appropriateness of this.
When dealing with childhood and children, there’s a remarkable and unfortunate tendency for people to completely forget what it was like to be a child and to attend a school. Schools already possess, for better or worse, an unbelievable amount of control over kids. This is for the most part a good thing – kids are incredibly stupid, and tend to get themselves into all sorts of problems. I’m certainly not saying schools shouldn’t have a reasonable amount of leeway to act in the best interests of children. However, forcing little girls to strip in the search for ibuprofen (!) is so far beyond that line that they should really call home, the line might be worried. People so wrap themselves up in this idea of “I’m protecting the children/country/sanctity of marriage” that they are unwilling to allow criticism of their actions, even once they have blown any sort of reasonable cost/benefit scale.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment