Not What We'd Had In Mind

They've done it again!

Those goofballs at Los Alamos Laboratories, the same cut-ups who brought you the atomic bomb, have just found a new way to bring fissionable nuclear material into your life!

It's the private reactor! That's right, for just a nominal fee, you too can light your town with its very own micro-reactor! The Bush administration being a paradigm of efficiency when it comes to corporate profit, has moved quickly and the publicly produced research has already been licensed to privately owned Hyperion, which is taking orders right now!

They claim that it's totally safe, contains no weapons grade materials*, and can't be stolen- because it's encased in concrete and buried underground! As one researcher put it, it would be like trying to steal, "...a hot barbecue grill..." I can relate to barbecue grills! There's one on my porch right now, and it's pretty safe! Of course, mine runs on the 18th century's uranium equivalent, charcoal...

What could be better! This will show all those Left wing nutjobs ranting about "using less electricity" or trying to develop "green" or "renewable" power sources! Thank you, Bush administration, for pressing ahead with this valuable program rather than those other ones. Finally, my suburban standard of living is secure! Thank you, Los Alamos, for putting nuclear reactors closer to me, and those I care about.

*Reactor, which must be refilled every decade, may contain lots of other nasty stuff though. Please do not ask about storage/disposal of these products. LALALALALA we can't hear you. Please go away.

The Texas Tea

So, can someone please explain why oil prices have just hit a one-year low? For one thing, I'm still paying over $3/gal for the stuff in its highly refined state, but more importantly, oil is one of those "commodities" that are supposed to be where investors flee when the paper markets tank.

Are they thinking we won't be able to afford cars soon?

DARPA Fischer- Tropsch

As a follow-up to an earlier post regarding alternative energy, DARPA, the DoD's research wing, has implemented a research project looking into cleaner alternatives to Fischer Tropsch conversion. The budget, a miserly 4.5 million, seems unlikely to produce many breakthroughs. See the full story in Aviation Week, one of the most misleadingly named publications ever and my new favorite magazine.

Drill Baby

As the election cycle has progressed, the price of gasoline has become increasingly central to the campaigns of both parties, and energy policy in the wider sense has seemed to recede to the periphery. 70% approval ratings are a powerful motivator. There are a few things I know. Petroleum is not indispensable- if we had to, we could stop using it tomorrow. Tremendous dislocation would result, but it isn't like oxygen or water. Buying it from regimes who don't necessarily like us is relevant, but not nearly so much as many politicians are claiming. The massive transfer of wealth from countries that are rich but lack oil to countries that are poor but have it may introduce new dynamics into international markets, but they hardly constitute a threat that could easily be remedied by increasing domestic oil production. Here is why- energy is about cheap. It isn't, although it probably should be, about clean or domestically produced. And it is much, much, much cheaper to buy your oil from Saudi princes who dislike you than to rely on domestic sources.

Let's test some assumptions. Who was the leading producer of refined petroleum in 1945? (Here's a hint- they produced so much, they fueled themselves and their allies in a global war effort simultaneously overrunning Europe and the Pacific.) Who today holds the world's largest petroleum reserves?

The answers, in order, are the United States and Canada.

So why do we keep buying oil from other places? US oil is usually relatively low grade, and Canadian oil is so low grade it's condensed into rocks- oil shale. Extracting the petroleum from rocks costs a fortune. In the years after 1945, oil companies began to open the first middle eastern fields, and they drove all others from the market. It is notably cheaper to haul oil up half a world away, load it into massive purpose built vessels using massive pumping and loading stations, and ship it to the far corners of the planet than to produce it locally. In the 1950's, it was so cheap France undertook a program to convert its power plants to burn imported oil- the cheapest fuel that could be found.

If we were interested in doing so, the US could reopen the fields which still contain sizable amounts of oil in Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. We could start taping into the shale fields that run down into the US from the far more substantial Canadian ones. We could even adopt the Fischer-Tropsh conversion process, allowing one to transform coal into oil, albeit at tremendous financial and environmental cost. We could probably achieve something akin to "energy security." We would also probably conservatively achieve something like $15 a gallon, paralyzing the economy almost as surely as that complete removal of oil I half-seriously posited above.

We keep buying oil from the middle east because its massive fields of light, sweet crude are cheap to refine, and thus cheap to buy. A truly global infrastructure exists to move it around the world, and it is traded on what is probably the most international of markets, in which China and India may well consume continually greater shares of limited refinery capacity.

So let's hold our political discourse to a slightly higher standard. If we are going to cast international energy purchases as a threat to national security, realize that the costs of "energy security" - defined as putting it to those dangerous foreign oil pushers -could include returning the horse to American streets as a competitive alternative for short-distance commuters. Additionally, those who claim that we are in danger of exhausting the planet's supplies should refine (sorry!) their point- we are in danger of running out of cheap oil, not oil generally. Americans who think that we should be drilling in ANWAR or on the continental shelves have lost their perspective- the most wildly optimistic estimates of what might be discoverd in those places amounts to 4% of global output, and no mechanism exists to insulate that new production from the global market mentioned above. We might marginally reduce the international cost for everyone, but anyone looking for the "Made in the USA" label on their gas pump is probably certifiable.

I suspect that a large part of the blame for curent high oil prices will in later years be found to lie with the Bush administration, and their decision to deregulate oil futures markets so that anyone could buy them, rather than restricting their sales to persons who could demonstrate refinery capacity. Guess what? The number of investors in oil futures increased dramatically. I'm sure their competitive bidding to purchase oil they can only store, not process, has had no effect on short term prices...

In the longer term, however, as Chinese and Indian populations purchase their own internal combustion engines, their demand for limited resources will increase, and more expensive sources of oil may become profitable. There is a recently opened Fischer-Tropsh plant operating a couple of hundred miles north of me in Ohio, making jet fuel at something like one ton of coal to the gallon.

More to the point, we need to get back to a conversation about systemic energy problems. If it's all going to cost more, our origin point should be GREEN energy. Oil is an input- what counts is the output. If our politicians want to strike a blow for real energy security this year, they should strike it against the use of fossil fuels at all, not which bit of rock we get them out of. Before the concept of polar ice becomes a quaint memory of a former age, we should draft legislation making it much harder for any person or community to impede the construction of wind turbines. 1% of the money currently being spent in Iraq should be converted into distributing free solar panels as we rotate those units home, and the converter boxes that will put the excess energy they capture back into the grid, reducing our need to burn other fuels. People buying electric cars, or better agreeing not to own one at all, should have some sort of encouragement for doing so in their taxes. An integrated power grid with green sources at one end and electric powered vehicles and homes at the other really would free us from the Faustian bargain we have been forced into with petroleum, and really all the other fossil fuels. That is a definition of energy security the future would look back on as truly visionary.