Coolest Headline I've Ever Seen

Here.

Commenter Greg Bringing the Weak Sauce

You may remember commenter Greg and his cut-and-paste shilling for Sarah Palin from this post. His comments were barely relevant to the post, and he didn't formulate any argument at all, except that she remains popular to some minority of the American people, which no one had disagreed with.

Nevertheless, I tried to engage the weak sauce, partly because we don't get a lot of Sarah Palin fans on the site, but also because (and perhaps this is evidence of a lack of ideological diversity in my everyday life) I don't regularly talk to anyone who sees her as a capable leader. You'd think he'd take the time to reply, as that would further his aims of mindless promotion. Hell, maybe he'd even convert a reader or two with his brilliant rhetoric, lining the pockets of SarahPac in the process.

Alas, it turns out he's just like her, fleeting and vacuous.

My Future Blogging Plans

Wanted to let my loyal reader(s) know that I'll be launching a new blog. It'll kick off Monday, if I can get everything together by then, or the following Monday if I need a bit more time. It will be devoted solely to EFCA (the Employee Free Choice Act). The layout will be a little different, though not radically. I've been putting together press releases, press lists, and trying to work on some layout issues...basically all the things I didn't do when I started TPBP. I've thought about cross posting to TPBP, but I think I'll use this space to post non-EFCA related commentary, should I have any.

I'll be sure to post here when the new blog's up and running.

You Don't (or Maybe You Do) Know Dick

I’ve followed with interest the exchange on TPM over the last few days about Dick Cheney’s change in personality. One of the fascinating stories of the last decade or so is Cheney’s transformation from boring, hardworking, rightwing technocrat to a secretive, really rightwing extralegal cipher. I think this explanation makes the most sense – this side of Cheney was always there, but it took a weakwilled manchild above him to allow him the space to really put it into effect. That said, I don’t think you can discount the idea of some sort of physiological transformation, either. I’ve known a few people who have had serious brain injuries that resulted in dramatic shifts in personality.

But, perhaps now is a good time to revisit this profile of Cheney from July, 2000 in the USA Today (Motto: “Almost like a newspaper!”).

Strip Search Supreme

The Supreme Court was considering a case today dealing with when it is appropriate to allow school officials to strip search students in the search for contraband. The ACLU lawyer discussed the school’s actions in terms of an “ick” factor, and certainly thinking about Clarence "Bill of Responsibilities" Thomas and Antonin Scalia discussing searching a girl’s underwear was enough to make me gag. As John Cole pointed out when talking about the same case, our priorities are seriously out of whack when there is even an argument about the appropriateness of this.

When dealing with childhood and children, there’s a remarkable and unfortunate tendency for people to completely forget what it was like to be a child and to attend a school. Schools already possess, for better or worse, an unbelievable amount of control over kids. This is for the most part a good thing – kids are incredibly stupid, and tend to get themselves into all sorts of problems. I’m certainly not saying schools shouldn’t have a reasonable amount of leeway to act in the best interests of children. However, forcing little girls to strip in the search for ibuprofen (!) is so far beyond that line that they should really call home, the line might be worried. People so wrap themselves up in this idea of “I’m protecting the children/country/sanctity of marriage” that they are unwilling to allow criticism of their actions, even once they have blown any sort of reasonable cost/benefit scale.

The Movement That Dare Not Speak Its Name

It's unclear whether Aaron should be treated as the proverbial marooned Japanese soldier, unaware of WWII's conclusion, or whether this should all be seen in a more spiritual light, a la the Resurrection. I'll combine the metaphors, pick up a rifle, and join Aaron's island coup. Because after all, one person's raving insanity is two people's grassroots movement..

Aaron tackled this to some extent in the comments section of his last post, but I think the Life and Times of Sarah Palin is relevant enough to warrant continued discussion. Aaron wrote:

As for Palin, I think it's a mistake to simply say, "She lost, forget about her." Palin was hugely popular with the conservative rump in this country.

Though Aaron didn't indicate otherwise, the issue in question is to what degree Palin remains popular with a significant minority of the GOP.

For those not up to speed, Palin's star in Alaska has fallen quite a bit in the wake of her November electoral defeat. She nominated a hard right candidate for attorney general who was subsequently denied confirmation by the Alaska legislature. She has had a series of avoidable problems filling an open legislative seat, the continued and public beef with Levi Johnson and family is increasingly petty and embarrassing, and she pissed off her legislature yet again after ditching the last day of an important session to headline a pro-life group's dinner in Indiana.

Despite all this, it's unclear what effect this will have on her statewide electoral prospects in Alaska, be they in a gubernatorial reelection bid or running for Murkowski's U.S. Senate seat (which appears unlikely).

I'm interested in how (or if) this will effect her popularity in the lower 48. Larison had a fairly interesting post recently on the schism between what he calls "mainstream conservatives" vs "dissidents" and why there was increasingly little conversation between the two groups. As "David Cameron's Tiny Wanker" alluded to in comments, the degree to which Palin has a legitimate national presence in 2012 is the degree to which the GOP is increasingly far afield from the body politic.

Combine this with the increasingly incendiary and bizarre comments coming from very mainstream Republican sources (John Boehner's truly sad interview with Stephanopolous last weekend, Texas' governor talking of secession, or nearly any Michelle Bachman comment). Throw in the fact that there is an established and powerful media presence actively promoting a lot of this rhetoric, and you have a situation that at the very least merits continued comment and observation.

Who is the leader of the opposition party? Seriously. Michael Steele? Ostensibly. John Boehner? Legislatively. Mitch McConnell? Ha. Rush Limbaugh? Rick Sanford? Bobby Jindal? I honestly don't know the answer, but there was a moment in time when Sarah Palin could have perhaps drawn a plurality of Republicans to her banner. It's unclear whether or not that time has passed. I think I would argue that it hasn't. It doesn't matter that that's a sad state of affairs. Sadly, no one knows who David Frum or David Brooks are. They know Palin, and literally tens of millions of people see her as their political leader.

Apple Goes to War

Via Slashdot, Newsweek reports that the US Army is issuing iPod Touches and iPhones to troops in the field as standard equipment. The uses are diverse and fascinating, from pulling down live video feeds from drones to calculating ballistics trajectories and looking up etiquette for cultural encounters. This is real science fiction stuff. Live video from above you? That's pretty out there.

What's also interesting, of course, is that living in New York City, the damn iPhone is completely ubiquitous. It's shocking how many people have those things. Their attraction is their versatility. An iPhone is really just a small computer with a great interface, and it's amazing that they are proving useful for everyone from yuppies to teenagers to soldiers in Afghanistan.

Pay No Attention to That Woman Behind the Curtain ...

Reihan Salam convinces himself that Sarah Palin has, sadly, lamentably, unaccountably, turned out to be a grasping, power-mad political hack in a post for the Daily Beast. This seems like the same story from the run up to the Iraq War played again, in the farce section of the program. Once again, everyone eventually comes around to the position that it was a mistake, but no one wants to admit that it was a lementable, hilariously predictable mistake from the very beginning. Read Salam's post for the sad and funny sight of a man trying to square a circle and failing:

What I’m wondering is: Has Sarah Palin undergone some kind of secret lobotomy?

Southern Hospitality

The flurry of blog-posting continues unabated as I find two articles that I wish to share in the course of a week! Hold on to your hats, folks!

Anyways, in a move that can only be described as "awesome," the Texas House took away the vast majority of Gov. Rick Perry's office budget to try and fund various projects, mostly mental health services and veteran's services. The article says that this is likely to be undone down the road, but hey, it's still funny.

But seriously, secession? Really? I can't add any more to what's already been said about the absurdity of the tea party nonsense, but it's just unbelievable that we have people carrying racist signs, complaining about the tax rate returning to Clinton era levels and refusing to take stimulus money to help out people in their states. And to top it all off, we have people out there who, apparently, seem to think that the solution is to secede. Fair enough.

In the (Depressing) Spotlight

Well, it's been a while since I've had anything to say to you guys, but I figure the New York Times doesn't bother to write articles about your hometown everyday. It includes a fairly decent video to accompany the article, with plenty of shots that make Newark look a lot nicer than it actually is.

The thing about Newark is, it really is in a bad way. It's right at the forefront of the collapse of the manufacturing economy and the rise of the service industry. Right now, it's running around an 11% unemployment rate. I think one of the things that gets lost in discussions of rural and suburban unemployment is the inability of people to go elsewhere. A lot of people say, "Well, why can't they just move to where there are jobs?" Moving costs money. You need a car to have a job in a place like Newark, and of course you need a job to have a car. There's only a hilarious parody of public transportation. And once you're wrapped up in debt, what else is there for you to do? It's a crushing feeling, and you can feel it hovering over the city. In the same way success builds on success, failure is a hard thing to escape.

Extinct Blog of the Day

Today's hospiced blog is...The Pseudo Body Politic. For the past two weeks I'm sure our loyal reader(s) has wondered what has befallen TPBP. Rest assured, pw, Aaron, manfish, and myself are all alive and well. Put simply, after a discussion with those folks, I've decided that TPBP has run its course.

On a more positive note, and one of the reasons I'm taking a hiatus from TPBP, is because it's looking likely that I'll soon be a contributing member to Beyond Bread, a blog run by Bread for the City, a large DC nonprofit that engages in all kinds of support services for DC residents in need of help. I'm not sure exactly when I'll be up and running with those folks, but it should be soon. I'll let you all know.

This blog started with a $1 bet (that has yet to be paid) with my friend Dome about whether TPBP would endure for a week. It did. It's been seven months, nearly 500 posts, four total contributors, and 200,000 words of original content. During it's tenure, over 1,000 separate people from 30 countries checked it out at one time or another.

In terms of content, some of it's been shit, and some of it (mostly from pw, Aaron, and manfish) has been quality. Sorry for anybody that had to wade through the former to get to the latter.

This blog came along when I desperately needed something to focus my time on, and a way to sharpen my writing skills. TPBP gave me both.

A blog is, above all, a community. To anybody that stopped by, commented, or contributed in any way, thanks. Commenters db, nick, and anonymous deserve a special shoutout, as does any cleveresque pseudonym my brother invented. Special thanks to Aaron, pw, and manfish, who are all great people and talented writers, and were willing to let me share this space with them.

I won't be "turning the blog off" so to speak. It will remain up and one never knows when one of us will show our Pseudo faces, so feel free to check back at your leisure.

Until then...

Learning From Past Mistakes

New RNC Chair Michael Steele did the talk show circuit this morning, and has presented the nation with his new vision for the Republican Party...except that it's the same as the current vision of the Republican Party.

I can't say this astonishes me. But does anyone out there feel like the reason the Republicans were just handed their electoral heads has a lot to do with their "failure to lead," Steele's stated reason?

It seems to me like they did rather too much leading, and most of it in direction I would categorize as "very wrong." No need to learn anything from that NYT map showing you with 5 states still in the Republican column, or the voices even from within the party suggesting you're in danger of becoming a regional rather than a national organization. Haven't you noticed how much your delegation has appreciated being included in governing decisions by President Obama this past week?

Enjoy your time in the wilderness. You might want to start getting comfortable.